2012-02-29
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
2012-02-29 |
![]() Title text: 2012-02-29 |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
![]() |
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
![]() |
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts should also describe what happens in each panel. |
- [Describe panel here]
- Do you think we're in simulated reality?
- The real question is whether we can simulate reality here.
- If we can make a simulation, then we're not in the least complicated reality.
- And if that simulation can contain another simulation, then we're at least two from the bottom
- If we assume each simulation is at most thousandth the size of the 'universe* and that possible
- One it's in, the the perspective smallest volume from of our universe is one planck-volume, then we are
- 61st from the bottom!
- x 61
- So, are there any simulations above us?
- Well for that we'd just have to find signs that we're optimized for good computation.
- Like maybe a minimum temperature or a maximum speed or a rule that position and momentum are only knowable to certain tolerances.
- Oh my god! I'm just a program!
- And I'm not even
- A good one!
- Hey now that's not true.
- The universe is a program. You're
- Just a subroutine.
Votey Transcript[edit]
![]() |
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts should also describe what happens in each panel. |
- [Describe panel here]
- I'm gonna delete myself!
- I
add a comment! ⋅
add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅
refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!