Demarcation
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
demarcation |
Title text: Why don't philosophers ever see all these things that are obvious to children? |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- Philosophers carp about whether there's a well-defined difference between hard and soft science. But it's easy to pinpoint!
- Just put the word "mad" in front of a practitioner of the discipline and see how scared you are.
- Oh.2
- "mad chemist." yikes! Definitely hard. "mad geneticist"? Probably making killer frog-men or something. Way scary. Hard science.
- Mad conservation biologist? Okay, maybe they're bringing back the t-rex for ecological reasons or something.
- A mad anthropologist might be, I dunno, sabotaging venerated cultural beliefs?
- Then, you can easily separate out pseudoscience because the mad versions are funny. Mad astrology? What's their crazy plan? Making astrology actually work?
- What's mad homeopathy? Trying to drown people?
- I can't tell if this is true or just stupid.
- That's because I'm a mad epistemologist/
Votey Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- When the fuck do we get our own book, anyway?
- il
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!