Fuel-efficiency
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
fuel-efficiency |
Title text: Last idea: Sit inside a ball that moves with wind patterns and just regularly check to see if you're at your destination yet. |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- New approaches to fuel efficiency:
- Idea 1: Car with onboard geothermal power generator.
- Pros:
- Cons:
- -Charge anywhere, simply by sinking metal rod toward center of earth
- -High upfront cost
- -Overuse may result in Earth's
- -Works in all weather, and on bottom of ocean
- core dying, death of all surface life
- -Neighbors will definitely know you
- are environmentally conscious
- Idea 2: Multistage car.
- Pros:
- Cons:
- -Used up stages can be jettisoned
- -Requires expensive radio receiver to communicate with mission control
- with little risk of danger to people inside car
- -Insurance claim process is cumbersome
- -Opportunity to tell police that only
- the third stage was speeding, and it's
- a small percentage of overall mass
- -Can only be used one awesome time
- Idea 3: Car with anger-capturing interior.
- Pros:
- -Harvests energy whenever you
- punch the ceiling, dash,
- or steering wheel -20 mpg highway, 2,718 mpg city -Increases driver likelihood of
- listening to conflicting points of view on talk radio
- Cons:
- -Negates delightful feeling of hatred toward other drivers
- -Cannot yet harvest self-loathing
- Idea 4: Car that can only go downhill.
- Pros:
- -Accelerometer detects angle of vehicle, preventing wasteful
- upward or lateral motion
- -Will be extremely valuable if Earth discovered to be both flat
- and at an incline -Technically uses negative fuel
- when employing regenerative braking
- Con:
- -Is honestly kind of a stupid idea
- Idea 5: Car that only technically moves.
- Pros:
- Cons:
- -Technically moving 30 kilometers
- -Hard drive to see movies
- per second relative to sun
- -"Car" will continue moving,
- -Due to elliptical movement,
- long after you and everyone
- vehicle is constantly accelerating
- whoever cared for you are dead
- -Energy of motion can be
- recovered by dropping Earth into sun
- Caption: smbc-comics.com
Votey Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- Dear Tesla Motors,
- Please consider this my resume
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!