Fuel-efficiency

From SMBC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
fuel-efficiency
Last idea: Sit inside a ball that moves with wind patterns and just regularly check to see if you're at your destination yet.
Title text: Last idea: Sit inside a ball that moves with wind patterns and just regularly check to see if you're at your destination yet.

Votey[edit]

1502378366-20170810after (1).png


Explanation[edit]

Ambox notice.png This explanation is either missing or incomplete.

Transcript[edit]

Ambox notice.png This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts should also describe what happens in each panel.
[Describe panel here]
New approaches to fuel efficiency:
Idea 1: Car with onboard geothermal power generator.
Pros:
Cons:
-Charge anywhere, simply by sinking metal rod toward center of earth
-High upfront cost
-Overuse may result in Earth's
-Works in all weather, and on bottom of ocean
core dying, death of all surface life
-Neighbors will definitely know you
are environmentally conscious
Idea 2: Multistage car.
Pros:
Cons:
-Used up stages can be jettisoned
-Requires expensive radio receiver to communicate with mission control
with little risk of danger to people inside car
-Insurance claim process is cumbersome
-Opportunity to tell police that only
the third stage was speeding, and it's
a small percentage of overall mass
-Can only be used one awesome time
Idea 3: Car with anger-capturing interior.
Pros:
-Harvests energy whenever you
punch the ceiling, dash,
or steering wheel -20 mpg highway, 2,718 mpg city -Increases driver likelihood of
listening to conflicting points of view on talk radio
Cons:
-Negates delightful feeling of hatred toward other drivers
-Cannot yet harvest self-loathing
Idea 4: Car that can only go downhill.
Pros:
-Accelerometer detects angle of vehicle, preventing wasteful
upward or lateral motion
-Will be extremely valuable if Earth discovered to be both flat
and at an incline -Technically uses negative fuel
when employing regenerative braking
Con:
-Is honestly kind of a stupid idea
Idea 5: Car that only technically moves.
Pros:
Cons:
-Technically moving 30 kilometers
-Hard drive to see movies
per second relative to sun
-"Car" will continue moving,
-Due to elliptical movement,
long after you and everyone
vehicle is constantly accelerating
whoever cared for you are dead
-Energy of motion can be
recovered by dropping Earth into sun
Caption: smbc-comics.com

Votey Transcript[edit]

Ambox notice.png This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts should also describe what happens in each panel.
[Describe panel here]
Dear Tesla Motors,
Please consider this my resume

Comment.png add a comment! ⋅ Comment.png add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ Icons-mini-action refresh blue.gif refresh comments!

Discussion

No comments yet!