Bayesing
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Bayesing |
 Title text: You can't prove me wrong because your proof requires arithmetic to work. |
Votey
Explanation
|
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript
|
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- I think we should all try to be bayesians.
- Suppose your prior probability that o equals 1 is precisely o.
- What?? Bayesianism can't possibly be true, and the proof is easy.
- You take a field observation and find that to your surprise o equals 1.
- The probability of that observation, given your prior assumption, is, let's say, 0.5.
- Bayesians should update but they can't because the observation that o equals 1 would change the mathematics of bayes' theorem directly, making the probability both o and 1/
- Your argument is that bayes' theorem can't account for incredibly stupid shit?
- And thus cannot be a complete description of our universe!
- smbc-comics.com
Votey Transcript
|
|
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- People love relatable humor
- 3
- In
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ 
refresh comments!
Discussion
"You could be presented with evidence that 0=1, but it will never be persuasive, because the prior is 0. So the Bayesian will always remain absolutely certain that 0≠1 no matter what evidence he is presented with, because thwt’s what a prior of 0 means." https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/bayesing?ht-comment-id=13700759