Literary-turing

|< < Prev Comic #5082 (November 7, 2018) Next > >|

literary-turing

Title text: Thanks to Ken, Michael, and Barbara from patreon for helping make this more clear! If anything is confusing, it's their fault.

Votey

Explanation

This explanation is either missing or incomplete.

Transcript

This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts should also describe what happens in each panel.

[Describe panel here]

Proposal: "the literary turing test" to evaluate if a non-fiction book should've been a paragraph

Step 1: Take 150 readers and divide them into three groups.

Step 2: One month after reading pair each member of group "a" with exactly one member of group "b" and one of group "c."

A

read 18

B

B

B

active

A

A

A

C

A

C

B

B

B

B

C

A

A

C

C

C

A

c

A

B

B

B

A

A

A

c

A

c

Step 3: Each group "a" member separately interrogates their assigned people from groups "b" and "c."

Step 4: Each group "a" member writes down who they believe read the paragraph and who they believe read the book.

A

Step 5: Tabulate results.

If group "a" is correct on more than two-thirds of their guesses, the book passes the test. Especially unitersiting episodes in

If group "a" does no better than chance, the book fails the test.

If group "a" is correct on fewer than one-third of their guesses, the book is assigned for a class on philosophical modernism.

American America

The goal of this course is to read foucault until you break down and buy the cliffnotes.

is

smbc-comics.com -

Votey Transcript

This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts should also describe what happens in each panel.

[Describe panel here]

This also goes for any philosopher who was from the 20th century and french. Doe & i)

 add a comment! ⋅  add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅  refresh comments!

Discussion

No comments yet!