Interesting-3
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
interesting-3 |
Title text: Look, you can only alter the set by removing elements, which objectively makes it less interesting. |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- A proof that no numbers are interesting:
- Suppose there exists the set containing all interesting numbers, s.
- Everyone knows about s, making it non-interesting.
- We have a contradiction.
- Caption: No numbers are interesting.
Votey Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- (this is why mathematicians prefer symbols to numbers)
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!