Death-of-an-economist
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
death-of-an-economist |
Title text: We need to continue collecting data right until the moment that I appear to be right. |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- Going to die horribly.
- Death -of an-economist
- I had a sip of methanol, which made me pleasantly inebriated. I defined inebriation to be happiness, then formed a model of methanol-happiness interactions that showed a strong positive correlation.
- At that point I insisted that anyone in the room not drinking methanol was a backwards opponent of progress.
- Later, it turned out there were second-order effects.
- As I go into the darkness. Please tell my academic offspring to redefine all the model's parameters, but keep the name the same
- You killed 50 people, including yourself
- OH, so
- You oppose randomized controlled
- Trials?
- smbc-comics.com
Votey Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- Here lies an economist. Technically she was never wrong
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!