Literary-turing
(Redirected from 5082)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
literary-turing |
![]() Title text: Thanks to Ken, Michael, and Barbara from patreon for helping make this more clear! If anything is confusing, it's their fault. |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
![]() |
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
![]() |
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts should also describe what happens in each panel. |
- [Describe panel here]
- Proposal: "the literary turing test" to evaluate if a non-fiction book should've been a paragraph
- Step 1: Take 150 readers and divide them into three groups.
- Step 2: One month after reading pair each member of group "a" with exactly one member of group "b" and one of group "c."
- A
- read 18
- B
- B
- B
- active
- A
- A
- A
- C
- A
- C
- B
- B
- B
- B
- C
- A
- A
- C
- C
- C
- A
- c
- A
- B
- B
- B
- A
- A
- A
- c
- A
- c
- Step 3: Each group "a" member separately interrogates their assigned people from groups "b" and "c."
- Step 4: Each group "a" member writes down who they believe read the paragraph and who they believe read the book.
- A
- Step 5: Tabulate results.
- If group "a" is correct on more than two-thirds of their guesses, the book passes the test. Especially unitersiting episodes in
- If group "a" does no better than chance, the book fails the test.
- If group "a" is correct on fewer than one-third of their guesses, the book is assigned for a class on philosophical modernism.
- American America
- The goal of this course is to read foucault until you break down and buy the cliffnotes.
- is
- smbc-comics.com -
Votey Transcript[edit]
![]() |
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts should also describe what happens in each panel. |
- [Describe panel here]
- This also goes for any philosopher who was from the 20th century and french. Doe & i)
add a comment! ⋅
add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅
refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!