2012-09-23
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
2012-09-23 |
Title text: 2012-09-23 |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- I got photos of this celebrity naked. How much will you pay me for them?
- Lemme see.
- No, too distant I can't resolve her features at all.
- Okay, this one's really zoomed in. You can see the microbial life in one of her ducts
- No, too close. I want to perceive her as a mate, not a biological system.
- Okay, zoomed out.
- Still too far. I can tell she has form, but I can't make out nipples.
- Okay, this one is zoomed in just far enough to see her hair
- Follicles.
- Too close. This could be leg or out arm far enoughthat need I can it ascertain zoomed a follicles. I whether the hairs are from goby area that's culturally or biologically sexualized I mean, otherwise, what's the point?
- Here, let me explain human sexuality with a diagram
- Creepy
- Boring
- So hot
- 1mm
- Im
- 10'm
- 10'm
- 10'm
- Distance
- You guys are pretty limited huh?
- Caption: Oh, that reminds me. No ugly chicks
Votey Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- I'm going back to zorblax where we only judge by proboscis curvature!
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!