2010-06-05
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| 2010-06-05 |
 Title text: 2010-06-05 |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
|
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
|
|
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts should also describe what happens in each panel. |
- [Describe panel here]
- "the prisoner's dilemma"is a concept from the field of game theory.
- Imagine two perfectly rational prisoners who don't know what the other is doing.
- Each can rat out the other or remain silent, resulting in 4 possible outcomes:
- Rat out
- Remain silent
- Rat out
- Both get \ year.
- goes free gets 5 years.
- goes free gets 5 years.
- Remain silent
- Both get six months.
- If you squeal, you get either 1 or 0 years. If you keep mum, it's 5 or 0.5 years.
- So, even though is the best choice, the "perfectly rational people pick
- A!!
- The dilemma can be applied to morality.
- Do unto others as you
- Like
- Would have them do unto you
- Bad for all
- Great for horrible for
- Like
- A
- B
- Great for
- Good for all
- Would have them do unto you
- Horrible for
- The great ethicists of history share essentially one goal: Get strangers to always pick
- Some did better than others.
- The greatest felicity for all is here! Eh? Come on! Maximize your felicity in square d ! Wooh!
- Bentham
- A
- Is made of fire!
- Christ
Votey Transcript[edit]
|
|
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts should also describe what happens in each panel. |
- [Describe panel here]
- Actually happened: 9:00 pm
- Testicles joke or math joke? Damn, this is hard.
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ 
refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!