Proof-3
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Proof |
 Title text: I may have set back statistics research briefly by asking if anyone on bluesky had a less tautological way to Monte Carlo your way to the solution to 1+1. |
Votey
Explanation
|
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript
|
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- This was proven empirically by drawing squares of equal area, sampling them via throwing n darts, and determining that as n grows large, the ratio of darts in each square approaches 1.
- I+1=2
- You could always tell the future statisticians.
Votey Transcript
|
|
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- I would like to take this opportunity to announce that annie is not allowed at my birthday on account of being a platonist.
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ 
refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!