2010-10-01
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
2010-10-01 |
Title text: 2010-10-01 |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- How controversy works
- Step 1: Crazy person says crazy thing.
- My political
- Opponents are all bonapartists!
- Step 2: Media personality assumes crazy person represents a large group.
- Congressman, do you support emperor napoleon returning from death to reign over america?/
- Step 3: Associated politicians refuse to give up publicity for any reason.
- I think the "bonapartist statement was meant to convey a broader dissatisfaction with government.
- Step 4: The fact that the non-issue became an issue becomes an issue.
- Why won't this story die? We explore this question
- In part fourteen of our
- Ongoing investigation.
- Step 5: Election results install the people who best wielded the controversy. Happily, humans are psychologically unable to connect the massive result to its tiny origin.
- How did this reform bill not pass?
- Complicated and meaningful reasons.
- Step 6 media gets sick of the issue and decides to move onto more compelling topics. Unless the crazy person says a new crazy thing.
- My opponents are all vikings!
Votey Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- My opponents are all weiners!
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!