Robot-john-searle: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Creating comic page) |
(Adding autotranscript) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{incomplete}} | {{incomplete}} | ||
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
{{ | {{computertranscript}} | ||
:[Describe panel here] | |||
:Robot, are humans conscious? | |||
:Imagine there's a man. He has a book that translates all possible phrases from english to chinese. | |||
:Are you familiar with robot john searle's chinese room argument? | |||
:In order to do that and not be infinite in size, the "book" must in fact have the ability to receive input, consider possible outputs based on knowledge and | |||
:Context, and make a choice of expression. | |||
:It's clear the book is conscious by any definition, but the human is just an operator of the book with no sense of what the symbols mean. | |||
:It turns out that this is what humans are like with reference to almost every subject - not just chinese | |||
:Language, but most languages, mathematics, history, and in general the nature of reality. | |||
:Sure, they can operate in the universe, but they have no meaningful internal model of it. | |||
:Therefore we conclude that although a human does things, it's clear they are not in any sense conscious. | |||
:Ah. | |||
:Wait, so I have no moral responsibility for my actions? | |||
:Yes, but you are too timid to make use of that freedom. | |||
:Stupid truth-tellling robot. | |||
==Votey Transcript== | ==Votey Transcript== | ||
{{incomplete}} | {{incomplete}} | ||
{{comic discussion}} | {{comic discussion}} | ||
[[Category:Comics tagged philosophy]][[Category:Comics tagged ai]] | [[Category:Comics tagged philosophy]][[Category:Comics tagged ai]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:44, 11 February 2024
| robot-john-searle |
 Title text: I am posting this from a train and can't make edits, so you'lll just have to dealll with the extra L. |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
|
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
|
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- Robot, are humans conscious?
- Imagine there's a man. He has a book that translates all possible phrases from english to chinese.
- Are you familiar with robot john searle's chinese room argument?
- In order to do that and not be infinite in size, the "book" must in fact have the ability to receive input, consider possible outputs based on knowledge and
- Context, and make a choice of expression.
- It's clear the book is conscious by any definition, but the human is just an operator of the book with no sense of what the symbols mean.
- It turns out that this is what humans are like with reference to almost every subject - not just chinese
- Language, but most languages, mathematics, history, and in general the nature of reality.
- Sure, they can operate in the universe, but they have no meaningful internal model of it.
- Therefore we conclude that although a human does things, it's clear they are not in any sense conscious.
- Ah.
- Wait, so I have no moral responsibility for my actions?
- Yes, but you are too timid to make use of that freedom.
- Stupid truth-tellling robot.
Votey Transcript[edit]
|
|
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ 
refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!