Metrics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Creating comic page) |
(Creating comic page) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| date = July 2, 2023 | | date = July 2, 2023 | ||
| title = metrics | | title = metrics | ||
| name = Metrics | |||
| image = 1688311442-20230702.png | | image = 1688311442-20230702.png | ||
| votey = 168831150220230702after.png | | votey = 168831150220230702after.png | ||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
{{incomplete}} | {{incomplete}} | ||
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
{{ | {{computertranscript}} | ||
:[Describe panel here] | |||
:How social science metrics work: | |||
:Step 1: Some victorian guy comes up with an ad hoc test. | |||
:Step 2: The method, being the only one available, is handed to young researchers. | |||
:It's not a perfect measure but it'll work until we know more. | |||
:Try using viscount fitzjibble's protocol. It's the best we have so far. | |||
:Step 3: The method proliferates asits initial ad hoc nature is forgotten. | |||
:Step 4: The method becomes entrenched. | |||
:You didn't run a vfp? Christ jesus can you even spell science? | |||
:Good data but you need to run viscount fitzjibble's protocol to be consistent with the literature. | |||
:00 | |||
:'s | |||
:Step 5: After a series of failures, new researchers call the method into question. | |||
:Step 6: It is too late. The method is more powerful than the scientists. | |||
:All hail the method. | |||
:And in fact fitzjibble never intended it to be a permanent method. Who woulda thought? | |||
:None of us believe in it, but none of us will fund projects that don't use it. | |||
:Shhh! Vfp is listening! Vfp hears all! | |||
:But but why? | |||
:Caption: smbc-comics.com | |||
==Votey Transcript== | ==Votey Transcript== | ||
{{ | {{computertranscript}} | ||
:[Describe panel here] | |||
:(the real fun starts when it leaks into policy discussions) | |||
{{comic discussion}} | {{comic discussion}} | ||
[[Category:Comics tagged science]] | [[Category:Comics tagged science]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:25, 31 July 2023
| Metrics |
 Title text: The really freaky part is when you hear about this going on in medical research. |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
|
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
|
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- How social science metrics work:
- Step 1: Some victorian guy comes up with an ad hoc test.
- Step 2: The method, being the only one available, is handed to young researchers.
- It's not a perfect measure but it'll work until we know more.
- Try using viscount fitzjibble's protocol. It's the best we have so far.
- Step 3: The method proliferates asits initial ad hoc nature is forgotten.
- Step 4: The method becomes entrenched.
- You didn't run a vfp? Christ jesus can you even spell science?
- Good data but you need to run viscount fitzjibble's protocol to be consistent with the literature.
- 00
- 's
- Step 5: After a series of failures, new researchers call the method into question.
- Step 6: It is too late. The method is more powerful than the scientists.
- All hail the method.
- And in fact fitzjibble never intended it to be a permanent method. Who woulda thought?
- None of us believe in it, but none of us will fund projects that don't use it.
- Shhh! Vfp is listening! Vfp hears all!
- But but why?
- Caption: smbc-comics.com
Votey Transcript[edit]
|
|
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- (the real fun starts when it leaks into policy discussions)
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ 
refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!