Pseudoscience: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Creating comic page) |
(Adding autotranscript) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{incomplete}} | {{incomplete}} | ||
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
{{ | {{computertranscript}} | ||
:[Describe panel here] | |||
:I want you to look at this ink blot and tell me what you see. | |||
:I see a pseudoscientific "testing" method with no empirical validity! | |||
:Very good. | |||
:comics.com | |||
==Votey Transcript== | ==Votey Transcript== | ||
{{ | {{computertranscript}} | ||
:[Describe panel here] | |||
:I'm great at this! | |||
:- | |||
{{comic discussion}} | {{comic discussion}} | ||
[[Category:Comics tagged science]] | [[Category:Comics tagged science]] |
Latest revision as of 13:30, 11 February 2024
pseudoscience |
Title text: Take that, 100 year old method largely no longer in use! |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- I want you to look at this ink blot and tell me what you see.
- I see a pseudoscientific "testing" method with no empirical validity!
- Very good.
- comics.com
Votey Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- I'm great at this!
- -
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!