Reverse: Difference between revisions

From SMBC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Creating comic page)
 
 
Line 19: Line 19:
{{computertranscript}}
{{computertranscript}}
:[Describe panel here]
:[Describe panel here]
:Hell, I'll take a klimt. Fuck these guys. S: ( )
:Hell, I'll take a klimt. Fuck these guys.
{{comic discussion}}
{{comic discussion}}
[[Category:Comics tagged philosophy]]
[[Category:Comics tagged philosophy]]

Latest revision as of 13:52, 13 November 2024

Reverse
If you could take the organs from a bunch of people and make a new person, what would you do?
Title text: If you could take the organs from a bunch of people and make a new person, what would you do?

Votey[edit]

173143617120241112after.png


Explanation[edit]

Run for your life.png This explanation is either missing or incomplete.

Transcript[edit]

Gday human.png This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2).
[Describe panel here]
Philosophy pro tip: All moral dilemmas are easy to solve in reverse:
If you could set elderly men on fire and new van goghs would pop out like a loot drop when they die, would you do it?
Hell yeah. Awesome.

Votey Transcript[edit]

Gday human.png This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2).
[Describe panel here]
Hell, I'll take a klimt. Fuck these guys.

Comment.png add a comment! ⋅ Comment.png add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ Icons-mini-action refresh blue.gif refresh comments!

Discussion

Which dilemmas?[edit]

The dilemma from the mouseover text is easy: if you can save the lives of ten persons by harvesting the organs from one healthy person, it is ethically imperative to do so? I'm still struggling to understand the dilemma from the main panel.