The-beauty-of-science: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Creating comic page) |
(Adding autotranscript) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{incomplete}} | {{incomplete}} | ||
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
{{ | {{computertranscript}} | ||
:[Describe panel here] | |||
:Do you think scientists appreciate beauty more than artists? | |||
:Have you heard what richard feynman said about flowers? | |||
:Huh? | |||
:Biology dept. | |||
:I have a friend who's an artist and has sometimes taken a view which I don't agree with very well. He'll hold up a flower and say "look how beautiful it is," and I'll agree. Then he says "I as an artist can see how beautiful this is but you as a scientist take this all apart and it becomes a dull thing," and I think that he's kind of nutty. First of all, the beauty that he sees is available to other people and to me too, I believe. Although I may not be quite as refined aesthetically as he is, I can appreciate the beauty of a flower. At the same time, I see much more about the flower than he sees. I could imagine the cells in there, the complicated actions inside, which also have a beauty. | |||
:That's the dumbest shit I ever heard | |||
:Look, that kind of thing might fly in a physics classroom, maybe even with some artists, but try it at my dissection table. | |||
:You think zoologists see extra beauty because they also know about the worms living in a dead possum's butt? How about the ubiquity of stds in the animal kingdom? | |||
:"you the artist see only the beautiful creature, but I the scientist also know about the discharges produced by its untreated chlamydia!" | |||
:Please stop | |||
:Beauty and truth are cumulative | |||
:Screaming | |||
:In math, physics, art, and literally nowhere else! | |||
:Caption: smbc-comics.com | |||
==Votey Transcript== | ==Votey Transcript== | ||
{{ | {{computertranscript}} | ||
:[Describe panel here] | |||
:It's chlamagical! | |||
{{comic discussion}} | {{comic discussion}} | ||
[[Category:Comics tagged science]] | [[Category:Comics tagged science]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:40, 11 February 2024
| the-beauty-of-science |
 Title text: This comic based directly on my gross biologist wife. |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
|
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
|
|
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts should also describe what happens in each panel. |
- [Describe panel here]
- Do you think scientists appreciate beauty more than artists?
- Have you heard what richard feynman said about flowers?
- Huh?
- Biology dept.
- I have a friend who's an artist and has sometimes taken a view which I don't agree with very well. He'll hold up a flower and say "look how beautiful it is," and I'll agree. Then he says "I as an artist can see how beautiful this is but you as a scientist take this all apart and it becomes a dull thing," and I think that he's kind of nutty. First of all, the beauty that he sees is available to other people and to me too, I believe. Although I may not be quite as refined aesthetically as he is, I can appreciate the beauty of a flower. At the same time, I see much more about the flower than he sees. I could imagine the cells in there, the complicated actions inside, which also have a beauty.
- That's the dumbest shit I ever heard
- Look, that kind of thing might fly in a physics classroom, maybe even with some artists, but try it at my dissection table.
- You think zoologists see extra beauty because they also know about the worms living in a dead possum's butt? How about the ubiquity of stds in the animal kingdom?
- "you the artist see only the beautiful creature, but I the scientist also know about the discharges produced by its untreated chlamydia!"
- Please stop
- Beauty and truth are cumulative
- Screaming
- In math, physics, art, and literally nowhere else!
- Caption: smbc-comics.com
Votey Transcript[edit]
|
|
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts should also describe what happens in each panel. |
- [Describe panel here]
- It's chlamagical!
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ 
refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!