Moral-relativity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Creating comic page) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
{{comic discussion}} | {{comic discussion}} | ||
[[Category:Comics tagged philosophy]][[Category:Comics tagged science]] | [[Category:Comics tagged philosophy]][[Category:Comics tagged science]] | ||
[[Category:Comics featuring the snow kids]] |
Latest revision as of 17:25, 4 July 2024
moral-relativity |
Title text: Now, we just need to unify it with quantum ethics and we're good to go. |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- I'm a moral relativist.
- Like, you don't believe in the concept of moral truth?
- No. I base my ethical system on my velocity relative to earth.
- That makes no sense.
- It's the only view that makes sense
- The closer I am to lightspeed relative to other humans, the more they appear to me to be living their
- The more fleeting their lives, the less significant they
- Seem to me.
- Lives in an
- Instant
- How does one assign personhood to a creature that might live and die in the span of one breath?
- I just don't think, for instance, you should be allowed to kill someone just because they have a slower reference frame.
- What quaint newtonian morality!
- Caption: smbc-comics.com
Votey Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- My theory why people get more misanthropic
- -3 D onplanes.
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!