Reverse

Title text: If you could take the organs from a bunch of people and make a new person, what would you do?

Votey[edit]

Explanation[edit]

This explanation is either missing or incomplete.

Transcript[edit]

This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2).

[Describe panel here]

Philosophy pro tip: All moral dilemmas are easy to solve in reverse:

If you could set elderly men on fire and new van goghs would pop out like a loot drop when they die, would you do it?

Hell yeah. Awesome.

Votey Transcript[edit]

This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2).

[Describe panel here]

Hell, I'll take a klimt. Fuck these guys.

add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!

Discussion

Which dilemmas?[edit]

The dilemma from the mouseover text is easy: if you can save the lives of ten persons by harvesting the organs from one healthy person, it is ethically imperative to do so? I'm still struggling to understand the dilemma from the main panel. 181.214.218.51 (talk) 14:22, 14 November 2024‎ (EST)

The classic dilemma is "If you could save the Mona Lisa or an old man from a burning building, which would you save?" The SMBC version is "Would you set old men on fire to get new priceless paintings?", which of course, is frickin' awesome. TinyPonies (talk) 18:53, 14 November 2024 (EST)

Reverse