Metrics
(Redirected from 6823)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Metrics |
Title text: The really freaky part is when you hear about this going on in medical research. |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- How social science metrics work:
- Step 1: Some victorian guy comes up with an ad hoc test.
- Step 2: The method, being the only one available, is handed to young researchers.
- It's not a perfect measure but it'll work until we know more.
- Try using viscount fitzjibble's protocol. It's the best we have so far.
- Step 3: The method proliferates asits initial ad hoc nature is forgotten.
- Step 4: The method becomes entrenched.
- You didn't run a vfp? Christ jesus can you even spell science?
- Good data but you need to run viscount fitzjibble's protocol to be consistent with the literature.
- 00
- 's
- Step 5: After a series of failures, new researchers call the method into question.
- Step 6: It is too late. The method is more powerful than the scientists.
- All hail the method.
- And in fact fitzjibble never intended it to be a permanent method. Who woulda thought?
- None of us believe in it, but none of us will fund projects that don't use it.
- Shhh! Vfp is listening! Vfp hears all!
- But but why?
- Caption: smbc-comics.com
Votey Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- (the real fun starts when it leaks into policy discussions)
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!