Enginomics
(Redirected from 6466)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
enginomics |
Title text: The second step is to get the cartoonists to leave town. |
Votey[edit]
Explanation[edit]
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- Oh yes. And that's only the beginning.
- The best way to improve the municipal economy is to attract a large number of engineers.
- Engineers generate value by making teeny tiny improvements in things like car parts, search results, and banking sof tware.
- However they think they generate value by 3d-printing the virtual decentralized blockchain of things or whatever.
- Although you only want them for the actual value-creation work, in order to attract and retain them, you have to have the stuff they think matters.
- So, you set up a cafe with bad coffee that accepts bitcoin but then immediately converts it to actual money. And a hackerspace with a bunch of 3d printers that are only good for impressing children. And a station for personal transport quadcopters that will never be built.
- All this costs almost nothing, but the engineers will come! Come in their thousands! Like lemmings with
- The entire municipal economic policy is to pay for pointless construction projects to sucker confused engineers into work they don't value.P
- Opinions about python!
- We are also
- Hoping to sucker confused finance people, but yes.
- smbc-comics.com
Votey Transcript[edit]
This transcript was generated by a bot: The text was scraped using AWS's Textract, which may have errors. Complete transcripts describe what happens in each panel — here are some good examples to get you started (1) (2). |
- [Describe panel here]
- Are you in there alienating your target audience?! R.
- In
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!