Fmri: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Creating comic page) |
(Manual transcript) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{incomplete}} | {{incomplete}} | ||
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
:[Two people are discussing a paper] | |||
:[ | :Person 1: In 2009, scientists ran a study that used normal fMRI analysis protocols to establish that a fish's brain was reacting to a photo. However, the study was done on a dead fish. | ||
: | :Person 2: Wow, I guess the interpretation is obvious: you can't always trust the established methods. | ||
: | |||
==Votey Transcript== | ==Votey Transcript== | ||
:[Zach's family are looking angrily at him while he's drawing] | |||
:[ | :Kelly: Wow. Only 8 years late on that joke. | ||
: | |||
{{comic discussion}} | {{comic discussion}} | ||
[[Category:Single panel comics]][[Category:Comics tagged science]] | [[Category:Single panel comics]][[Category:Comics tagged science]] | ||
Revision as of 16:21, 17 December 2024
| fmri |
 Title text: I'm shocked nobody's proposed this obvious interpretation of the data. |
Votey
Explanation
|
This explanation is either missing or incomplete. |
Transcript
- [Two people are discussing a paper]
- Person 1: In 2009, scientists ran a study that used normal fMRI analysis protocols to establish that a fish's brain was reacting to a photo. However, the study was done on a dead fish.
- Person 2: Wow, I guess the interpretation is obvious: you can't always trust the established methods.
Votey Transcript
- [Zach's family are looking angrily at him while he's drawing]
- Kelly: Wow. Only 8 years late on that joke.
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ 
refresh comments!
Discussion
No comments yet!