Editing On-the-etiology-of-fuckers

{{comic
	| number    = 4396
	| date      = February 20, 2017
	| title     = on-the-etiology-of-fuckers
	| image     = 1487607417-20170220.png
	| votey     = 1487607702-20170220after.png
	| titletext = The author of this paper is named Et Al.
}}
==Explanation==
{{incomplete}}
==Transcript==
{{Computertranscript}}
:[Describe panel here]
:The question is whyp
:Of the 10% rule
:Univorsality
:By simple probability, fucker-free and fucker laden communities should be easy to discover and yet, they are almost never found
:Do organizations attract fuckers, increasing their aggregate fuckery until they achieve carrying capacity?
:11-1-1-
:Or does the existence of an organizational structure itself induce fuckery among a subset of members?
:After
:Careful
:Analysis
:And
:Experiment,
:We've that all humans have a fucker quorum-sensing mechanism.
:Discovered
:a
:When at least ten humans are in a room and none are fuckers. They each experience an upregulation in fuckery-related hormones
:The first person to reach critical fuckery emits a signal into the rest of the group.
:Fuck bitches am right?
:High fuckery-related hormone individuals are attracted to the signal source
:Individuals too close to the alpha fucker will be repelled by intense fuckery, while individuals who are too peripheral will lose interest.
:de
:8
:Individuals in the goldifucks zone will continue to upregulate until they become a full-blown bunch of fuckers
:3
:If the zone is too large the group will begin rioting and disrupt if it is too small a new alpha fucker will emerge. The process continues until a stable 10% threshold is achieved
:Any questions?
:o
:Do made social science worse? You think mathematics has
==Votey Transcript==
{{Computertranscript}}
:[Describe panel here]
:10 points to anyone proposing units of fuckery to me online
{{comic discussion}}
[[Category:Comics tagged science]]