Editing Repugnant (section)

==Transcript==
{{computertranscript}}
:[Describe panel here]
:Are you familiar with parfit's "repugnant conclusion"? Where utilitarians are forced to admit that, say, a society of a trillion slightly happy people might be preferable to a society of a thousand blissed out people?
:Pfft, that's dumb.
:The human mind
:A society of a trillion people is a galaxy-spanning planet-manipulating techno-miracle. If einstein was one in a billion, they have a thousand einsteins. If they haven't yet worked out brain manipulation, they will about four seconds after they realize they want to.
:Is a three-pound
:Hallucination blissing out is an engineering
:Challenge.
:Meanwhile, the thousand blissed out people are a small enough society that they can't possibly support bliss for long.
:The repugnant conclusion is an unstable equilibrium. If you instantaneously
:No complex division of labor means no modern medicine, no robust supply chains of food. Tragedy will hit them and they'll have no choice but to endure sorrow.
:Created it in simulation, it would immediately cease its repugnance.
:When you put your econ in my philosophy it makes me feel gross.
:Grow up
:smbc-comics.com