Editing Demarcation (section)

==Transcript==
{{Computertranscript}}
:[Describe panel here]
:Philosophers carp about whether there's a well-defined difference between hard and soft science. But it's easy to pinpoint!
:Just put the word "mad" in front of a practitioner of the discipline and see how scared you are.
:Oh.2
:"mad chemist." yikes! Definitely hard. "mad geneticist"? Probably making killer frog-men or something. Way scary. Hard science.
:Mad conservation biologist? Okay, maybe they're bringing back the t-rex for ecological reasons or something.
:A mad anthropologist might be, I dunno, sabotaging venerated cultural beliefs?
:Then, you can easily separate out pseudoscience because the mad versions are funny. Mad astrology? What's their crazy plan? Making astrology actually work?
:What's mad homeopathy? Trying to drown people?
:I can't tell if this is true or just stupid.
:That's because I'm a mad epistemologist/